Dear colleagues, My co-authors and I would like to share our recent publication: Low-frequency sampling rates are effective to record bottlenose dolphins The paper was published this week in the Royal Society Open Science and is available as an open access article here: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.201598 Abstract Acoustic monitoring in cetacean studies is an effective but expensive approach. This is partly because of the high sampling rate required by acoustic devices when recording high-frequency echolocation clicks. However, the proportion of echolocation clicks recorded at different frequencies is unknown for many species, including bottlenose dolphins. Here, we investigated the echolocation clicks of two subspecies of bottlenose dolphins in the western South Atlantic Ocean. The possibility of recording echolocation clicks at 24 and 48 kHz was assessed by two approaches. First, we considered the clicks in the frequency range up to 96 kHz. We found a loss of 0.95–13.90% of echolocation clicks in the frequency range below 24 kHz, and 0.01–0.42% below 48 kHz, to each subspecies. Then, we evaluated these recordings downsampled at 48 and 96 kHz and confirmed that echolocation clicks are recorded at these lower frequencies, with some loss. Therefore, despite reaching high frequencies, the clicks can also be recorded at lower frequencies because echolocation clicks from bottlenose dolphins are broadband. We concluded that ecological studies based on the presence–absence data are still effective for bottlenose dolphins when acoustic devices with a limited sampling rate are used. I am available to answer any questions regarding our work: romeu.bianca@gmail.com Best regards, -- *Bianca Romeu * CRBio 88562/03-D ^ | \ __ - | - \ __ _ _/ -- -- \ __ _/ -- \ / @ ) _ / __-- ===> / _ __ -- _ _ _ _ -- -- / / | / / / |/ __/ /__ /__^__ /