Dear MARMAM Community, On behalf of my co-authors at the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, I am pleased to announce two publications related to age estimation of Florida manatees using growth layers in their earbones: Lonati, G. L., Howell, A. R., Hostetler, J. A., Schueller, P., de Wit, M., Bassett, B. L., Deutsch, C. J., and Ward-Geiger, L. I. (2019) Accuracy, precision, and error in age estimation of Florida manatees using growth layer groups in earbones. Journal of Mammalogy, 10(4): 1350-1363. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyz079 (open access) Ages of Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris) can be estimated by counting annual growth layer groups (GLGs) in the periotic dome portion of the tympanoperiotic complex of their earbones. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission manages an archive of more than 8,700 Florida manatee earbones collected from salvaged carcasses from 1989 to 2017. Our goal was to comprehensively evaluate techniques used to estimate age, given this large sample size and changes to processing protocols and earbone readers over time. We developed new standards for estimating ages from earbones, involving two independent readers to obtain measurements of within- and between-reader precision. To quantify accuracy, precision, and error, 111 earbones from manatees with approximately known ages (first known as calves: “KAC”) and 69 earbones from manatees with minimum known ages (“MKA,” based on photo-identification sighting histories) were processed, and their ages were estimated. There was greater precision within readers (coefficient of variation, CV: 2.4–8.5%) than between readers (CV: 13.1–13.3%). The median of age estimates fell within the true age range for 63.1% of KAC cases and was at least the sighting duration for 75.0% of MKA cases. Age estimates were generally unbiased, as indicated by an average raw error ± SD of −0.05 ± 3.05 years for the KAC group. The absolute error (i.e., absolute value of raw error) of the KAC data set averaged 1.75 ± 2.50 years. Accuracy decreased and error increased with increasing known age, especially for animals over 15 years old, whose ages were mostly underestimated due to increasing levels of resorption (the process of bone turnover that obscures GLGs). Understanding the degree of uncertainty in age estimates will help us assess the utility of age data in manatee population models. We emphasize the importance of standardizing and routinely reviewing age estimation and processing protocols to ensure that age data remain consistent and reliable. -------------------- Lonati, G. L., Howell, A. R., Schueller, P., and Deutsch, C. J. (2021) Using tetracycline to evaluate age estimation in a long-lived aquatic mammal. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 45(2): 340-350. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1192 (available upon request - gina.lonati@unb.ca) Age estimation is useful for understanding population parameters and, in many vertebrates, relies on the principle that growth layer groups (GLGs) are deposited annually in specific tissues. In Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris), GLGs in earbones are used to estimate age at death. Opportunities to validate the rate of GLG deposition in earbones from manatees >15 years old are rare, yet important for ensuring accurate age estimation across the species’ lifespan. Tetracycline injection is a useful method for validating GLG interpretations, particularly when the exact age of an animal is unknown. Since 1997, we collected earbones from 10 manatees that were ≥13–69 years old at death and had been injected with tetracycline 9–37 years before death. The number of years since injection (YSI) was estimated by photographing earbone cross-sections under ultraviolet light, measuring the distance between the fluorescent tetracycline mark and earbone edge, processing the earbones to visualize GLGs, superimposing the distance to evaluate the marks’ locations relative to GLGs, and counting the GLGs between the mark and earbone edge. Seven earbones had tetracycline marks, although 2 of the marks were dull or discontinuous. On average, estimated YSI was 5.6 (SD = 7.5) years less than the known YSI; however, the error was nearly always ≤2 years for manatees that had been injected <20 years before death, consistent with an annual rate of GLG deposition at younger ages. Resorption (i.e., bone turnover) that obliterated GLGs was likely why YSI was underestimated in old manatees with longer post-injection intervals, although we cannot exclude the possibility that GLG deposition rate may slow in old age. We discuss how age, extrinsic stressors, life history events, and laboratory processing may affect tetracycline visibility, earbone growth, and GLG interpretation. Our study reinforces the challenges with accurately estimating the age of old individuals in long-lived mammalian species. Please reach out with any questions. Thank you! Gina & colleagues Gina Lonati PhD Student (she/her) University of New Brunswick Saint John https://glonati2222.wixsite.com/research gina.lonati@unb.ca