Dear Marmam community,
My co-authors and I are excited to share with you our new study on vessel noise interference with fine-scale foraging behavior of killer whales, published in Global Change Biology. The paper, "Males miss and females forgo: Auditory masking from vessel noise impairs foraging efficiency and success in killer whales" is fully available online via open access. The reference information, DOI and abstract are provided below.
Tennessen,
J. B.,
Holt,
M. M.,
Wright,
B. M.,
Hanson,
M. B.,
Emmons,
C. K.,
Giles,
D. A.,
Hogan,
J. T.,
Thornton,
S. J., &
Deecke,
V. B. (
2024).
Males miss and females forgo: Auditory masking from vessel noise impairs foraging efficiency and success in killer whales.
Global Change Biology,
30, e17490.
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17490
Abstract
Understanding how the environment mediates an organism's ability to meet
basic survival requirements is a fundamental goal of ecology. Vessel
noise is a global threat to marine ecosystems and is increasing in
intensity and spatiotemporal extent due to growth in shipping coupled
with physical changes to ocean soundscapes from ocean warming and
acidification. Odontocetes rely on biosonar to forage, yet determining
the consequences of vessel noise on foraging has been limited by the
challenges of observing underwater foraging outcomes and measuring noise
levels received by individuals. To address these challenges, we
leveraged a unique acoustic and movement dataset from 25 animal-borne
biologging tags temporarily attached to individuals from two populations
of fish-eating killer whales (Orcinus orca) in highly transited
coastal waters to (1) test for the effects of vessel noise on foraging
behaviors—searching (slow-click echolocation), pursuit (buzzes), and
capture and (2) investigate the mechanism of interference. For every
1 dB increase in maximum noise level, there was a 4% increase in the
odds of searching for prey by both sexes, a 58% decrease in the odds of
pursuit by females and a 12.5% decrease in the odds of prey capture by
both sexes. Moreover, all but one deep (≥75 m) foraging attempt with
noise ≥110 dB re 1 μPa (15–45 kHz band; n = 6 dives by n = 4
whales) resulted in failed prey capture. These responses are consistent
with an auditory masking mechanism. Our findings demonstrate the
effects of vessel noise across multiple phases of odontocete foraging,
underscoring the importance of managing anthropogenic inputs into
soundscapes to achieve conservation objectives for acoustically
sensitive species. While the timescales for recovering depleted prey
species may span decades, these findings suggest that complementary
actions to reduce ocean noise in the short term offer a critical pathway
for recovering odontocete foraging opportunities.
Best wishes,
Jennifer B. Tennessen, Ph.D.
Senior Research Scientist
Center for Ecosystem Sentinels
Department of Biology
University of Washington, Seattle, WA